Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome and Eclampsia in the Setting of Magnesium Toxicity: A Case Report.

Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) is a rare neurologic condition and a feared complication of eclampsia. It is evidenced by acute neurologic dysfunction secondary to cerebral edema and is typically reversible in nature. Although it is a relatively new diagnosis, an increasing amount of literature has described its occurrence, including an association with hypomagnesemia. We present a case wherein a 24-year-old parturient developed PRES and eclampsia in the setting of symptomatic hypermagnesemia, requiring management with lorazepam after seizures developed. Here we detail her clinical course, including the unique challenges of treating eclampsia and PRES in the setting of magnesium toxicity.

Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome in a patient with late postpartum eclampsia.

RATIONALE: Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) is a rare complication commonly associated with headache and acute changes in blood pressure that results from a variety of causes, culminating in vasogenic cerebral edema in the occipital and parietal lobes of the brain. PATIENT CONCERNS: We report here a woman who suffered from headache, generalized tonic-clonic seizures, and cortical blindness in the late postpartum period. DIAGNOSES: Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome. INTERVENTIONS: The patient was treated with amlodipine besylate tablets for hypertension, dehydration with mannitol and glycerin fructose, and antispasmodic treatment with sodium valproate and oxcarbazepine. OUTCOMES: On day 2, the patient became conscious, headache and vision improved. One week later, symptoms and signs disappeared, blood pressure returned to normal, and brain MRI lesions disappeared in re-examination. LESSONS: Eclampsia associated with PRES is reversible in most cases, but it is a serious and potentially life-threatening obstetric emergency. If adequate treatment is provided in a timely manner, most women will make a full recovery. Attention needs to be paid to timely and adequate treatment, as well as appropriate follow-up and support for patients with PRES.

Alternative magnesium sulphate regimens for women with pre-eclampsia and eclampsia.

BACKGROUND: Magnesium sulphate is the drug of choice for the prevention and treatment of women with eclampsia. Regimens for administration of this drug have evolved over the years, but there is no clarity on the comparative benefits or harm of alternative regimens. This is an update of a review first published in 2010. OBJECTIVES: To assess if one magnesium sulphate regimen is better than another when used for the care of women with pre-eclampsia or eclampsia, or both, to reduce the risk of severe morbidity and mortality for the woman and her baby. SEARCH METHODS: We searched Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth's Trials Register, ClinicalTrials.gov, the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (29 April 2022), and reference lists of retrieved studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised trials and cluster-randomised trials comparing different regimens for administration of magnesium sulphate used in women with pre-eclampsia or eclampsia, or both. Comparisons included different dose regimens, intramuscular versus intravenous route for maintenance therapy, and different durations of therapy. We excluded studies with quasi-random or cross-over designs. We included abstracts of conference proceedings if compliant with the trustworthiness assessment. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: For this update, two review authors assessed trials for inclusion, performed risk of bias assessment, and extracted data. We checked data for accuracy. We assessed the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach. MAIN RESULTS: For this update, a total of 16 trials (3020 women) met our inclusion criteria: four trials (409 women) compared regimens for women with eclampsia, and 12 trials (2611 women) compared regimens for women with pre-eclampsia. Most of the included trials had small sample sizes and were conducted in low- and middle-income countries. Eleven trials reported adequate randomisation and allocation concealment. Blinding of participants and clinicians was not possible in most trials. The included studies were for the most part at low risk of attrition and reporting bias. Treatment of women with eclampsia (four comparisons) One trial compared a loading dose-alone regimen with a loading dose plus maintenance dose regimen (80 women). It is uncertain whether either regimen has an effect on the risk of recurrence of convulsions or maternal death (very low-certainty evidence). One trial compared a lower-dose regimen with standard-dose regimen over 24 hours (72 women). It is uncertain whether either regimen has an effect on the risk of recurrence of convulsion, severe morbidity, perinatal death, or maternal death (very low-certainty evidence). One trial (137 women) compared intravenous (IV) versus standard intramuscular (IM) maintenance regimen. It is uncertain whether either route has an effect on recurrence of convulsions, death of the baby before discharge (stillbirth and neonatal death), or maternal death (very low-certainty evidence). One trial (120 women) compared a short maintenance regimen with a standard (24 hours after birth) maintenance regimen. It is uncertain whether the duration of the maintenance regimen has an effect on recurrence of convulsions, severe morbidity, or side effects such as nausea and respiratory failure. A short maintenance regimen may reduce the risk of flushing when compared to a standard 24 hours maintenance regimen (risk ratio (RR) 0.27, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.08 to 0.93; 1 trial, 120 women; low-certainty evidence). Many of our prespecified critical outcomes were not reported in the included trials. Prevention of eclampsia for women with pre-eclampsia (five comparisons) Two trials (462 women) compared loading dose alone with loading dose plus maintenance therapy. Low-certainty evidence suggests an uncertain effect with either regimen on the risk of eclampsia (RR 2.00, 95% CI 0.61 to 6.54; 2 trials, 462 women) or perinatal death (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.19 to 1.36; 2 trials, 462 women). One small trial (17 women) compared an IV versus IM maintenance regimen for 24 hours. It is uncertain whether IV or IM maintenance regimen has an effect on eclampsia or stillbirth (very low-certainty evidence). Four trials (1713 women) compared short postpartum maintenance regimens with continuing for 24 hours after birth. Low-certainty evidence suggests there may be a wide range of benefit or harm between groups regarding eclampsia (RR 1.99, 95% CI 0.18 to 21.87; 4 trials, 1713 women). Low-certainty evidence suggests there may be little or no effect on severe morbidity (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.29; 2 trials, 1233 women) or side effects such as respiratory depression (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.25 to 2.61; 2 trials, 1424 women). Three trials (185 women) compared a higher-dose maintenance regimen versus a lower-dose maintenance regimen. It is uncertain whether either regimen has an effect on eclampsia (very low-certainty evidence). Low-certainty evidence suggests that a higher-dose maintenance regimen has little or no effect on side effects when compared to a lower-dose regimen (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.01; 1 trial 62 women). One trial (200 women) compared a maintenance regimen by continuous infusion versus a serial IV bolus regimen. It is uncertain whether the duration of the maintenance regimen has an effect on eclampsia, side effects, perinatal death, maternal death, or other neonatal morbidity (very low-certainty evidence). Many of our prespecified critical outcomes were not reported in the included trials. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Despite the number of trials evaluating various magnesium sulphate regimens for eclampsia prophylaxis and treatment, there is still no compelling evidence that one particular regimen is more effective than another. Well-designed randomised controlled trials are needed to answer this question.

Optimizing Delivery Strategies in Eclampsia: A Comprehensive Review on Seizure Management and Birth Methods.

Eclampsia seizure is an always serious and potentially fatal obstetric condition. Safe delivery in women with pregnancies complicated by eclampsia seizures is still one of the greatest challenges in perinatal medicine. Pregnancy should be terminated (childbirth) in the safest and least traumatic way possible. Attempting vaginal delivery can take place only exceptionally, in the event of possibly quick completion of childbirth with a stable state of the mother and the fetus. However, immediate labor via cesarean section is most often recommended. It is essential to maintain left lateral patient positioning during cesarean section. Regional anesthesia can be used only in conscious patients who are free from coagulopathy and from HELLP (hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelet count) syndrome to decrease the risk of aspiration and failed intubation attempts in preeclamptic or eclamptic women. For sudden, unexpected interventions, when a patient arrives at the hospital with an eclampsia seizure without lab results, general anesthesia can be the best option and should be performed by an experienced medical team of anesthesiologists, ready to perform difficult intubation. Magnesium sulfate is the drug that should be used first to stop eclamptic convulsions and prevent their recurrence. Intravenous antihypertensive drugs can stabilize elevated blood pressure (BP), preventing multiorgan failure and recurrent eclampsia seizure, and thus the prevention of maternal death. This article aims to review the management of seizures during pregnancy in women with eclampsia to ensure safe delivery.

Eclampsia: A Critical Pregnancy Complication Demanding Enhanced Maternal Care: A Review.

Eclampsia is the most serious pregnancy complication and one of the main causes of death of pregnant and delivering women. The mortality rate of young mothers is 5-20%, emphasizing the severity of this pregnancy-related disorder. Today many centers have only rare opportunities to see and deal with eclampsia cases; therefore, it is very important to bring this emergency medical condition to the attention of attending physicians. All patients with eclampsia, and after eclamptic seizures, should be treated in an intensive care unit. However, taking into account clinical realities, especially in developing countries, this is not always possible. It is necessary for all gynecologists-obstetricians to be fully prepared for eclampsia, although its occurrence is very rare. Drug treatment aims to stop eclampsia seizures and prevent reoccurrence of convulsions and complications. Magnesium sulphate is the drug of first choice used in treatment of eclampsia seizure, whereas treatment with the use of antihypertensive drugs and proper blood pressure control is one of the most important factors effectively reducing the risk of deaths or acute complications and poor pregnancy outcomes. The most urgent part of the treatment is the lifesaving procedure involving airways patency assessment, maintenance of breathing and blood circulation of the mother, securing an adequate oxygen level of the mother and thereby of the fetus, and prevention of injuries. This review aims to present an overview of the current prevalence, diagnosis, and management of eclampsia and the need for improved maternal care.

Comparison of Zuspan regimen and its 12-hour modification in women with severe pre-eclampsia and eclampsia in two hospitals in Abeokuta.

BACKGROUND: Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy (HDP) are leading causes of maternal mortality (with severe pre-eclampsia/eclampsia [SPE/EC] being causes of death). Magnesium sulphate (MgSO4) has proven to be the drug of choice for SPE/EC management. However, its availability and cost remain a drawback to its use in developing countries. This study aimed to compare Zuspan regimen with its 12-hour modification for SPE/EC management in two major hospitals in Abeokuta, Ogun state, South Western Nigeria. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial of non-inferior parallel design carried out at Federal Medical Centre and Sacred Heart Hospital, Abeokuta involving 148 consenting women who were randomized into two groups A and B. Both groups had 4 g loading dose of MgSO4, but the duration of maintenance was reduced to 12-hours in Group A (intervention) while Group B received the standard Zuspan regimen (control). Outcome measures were the occurrence/recurrence of convulsions (primary), maternal side effects and perinatal outcomes (secondary). RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in the occurrence/recurrence of seizures between the two groups for both SPE/EC. No signs of maternal toxicity were observed in both arm of the study. There were no statistically significant differences in the perinatal/neonatal death and Apgar scores at 1 and 5 min. However, there was a significant increase in the number of days on admission in the control group of those neonates delivered to mothers with eclampsia. CONCLUSION: A 12-hr modification of Zuspan regimen was found to be non-inferior to the standard Zuspan regimen in the management of SPE/EC.

Eclampsia in Italy: A prospective population-based study (2017-2020).

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the incidence, and to investigate risk factors, management, and perinatal outcomes of eclampsia in Italy. STUDY DESIGN: This is a prospective population-based cohort study enrolling all women admitted for eclampsia between November 2017 and March 2020. Incident cases were reported using electronic and anonymous data collection forms. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence, risk factors, maternal and perinatal morbidity, and mortality. RESULTS: 109 cases were included for an estimated incidence rate of 1.5 (95 % CI 1.2-1.8) per 10.000 births. Risk of developing eclampsia was associated with multiple pregnancies (RR = 4.51; p < 0.001) and with pregnancies achieved with assisted reproductive technologies (RR = 3.03; p < 0.001). Magnesium sulfate was used as prophylaxis in almost 30 % of women with preeclampsia, and to treat an eclamptic fit in 89 % of women. The time interval between the first fit and delivery was 62 min for antepartum and 10 min for intrapartum cases. Around one third of women developed at least one other major complication and one mother died. Severe morbidity affected 13.3 % of the newborns. Two fetal and one neonatal death were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Our data revealed low incidence of eclampsia in Italy and prompt administration of antihypertensive drugs and magnesium sulfate to prevent eclampsia and to treat the recurrence of seizures. However, the rate of severe maternal complications is still high: increasing the time interval between fit and delivery seems to be crucial to achieve an effective stabilization of maternal conditions and reduce maternal major complications.

Modulatory effect of two regimens of magnesium sulfate on the systemic inflammatory response in pregnant women with imminent eclampsia.

OBJECTIVE: This study compared the modulatory effect of two intravenous magnesium sulfate (MgSO4) regimens on the systemic inflammatory response in pregnant women diagnosed with imminent eclampsia. STUDY DESIGN: In a single-blind cross-sectional study, 33 women were allocated according to the Zuspan (n = 16) and Sibai (n = 17) MgSO4 regimens, and treated for 24 h. Blood samples were collected pre-administration of the loading dose, at 24 h of the maintenance dose of MgSO4, and at 48 h, when patients were without treatment. Plasma was used to determine interleukin (IL)-1 beta (IL-1ß), IL-6, IL-10, tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), heat shock protein (Hsp70), and heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1) by ELISA. RESULTS: The treatment with the Zuspan's regimen didn't change plasma concentrations of TNF-α, IL-10, and Hsp70 in the three-time points studied. However, it decreased IL-1ß at 24 h and 48 h and IL-6 at 48 h, and increased HO-1 concentration at 48 h. On the other hand, compared to the pre-treatment period, Sibai's regimen induced a significant decrease in TNF-α, IL-1ß, IL-6, and Hsp70, while increased HO-1 levels both at 24 h and 48 h and, IL-10 concentration at 48 h. CONCLUSIONS: Sibai's regimen determined an early and efficient immunoregulatory effect on systemic inflammatory response in preeclampsia, suggesting that the maintenance dose of two grams of MgSO4 was better than one gram in the treatment of imminent eclampsia.

Neonatal magnesium levels are safe after maternal MgSO4 administration: a comparison between unexposed preterm neonates and neonates exposed for fetal neuroprotection or maternal eclampsia prevention-a cohort study.

To objective of this study was to compare neonatal magnesemia in the first 15 days of neonatal life between three groups: a control group not exposed to MgSO4, a neuroprotection group, and an eclampsia prevention group, and to explore its associations with child outcomes. A retrospective single-centre cohort study was performed in a tertiary care setting. Infants admitted at the neonatal intensive care unit born between 24 and 32 weeks' gestation, regardless of etiology of preterm birth, were included. The mean outcome measure was neonatal magnesemia (mmol/L). Linear mixed regression of neonatal magnesemia on exposure group and day of life was done. Generalised estimating equation models of child outcomes on neonatal magnesemia according to exposure group and day of life were made. The analyses showed that in neonatal magnesemia is significantly higher in the preeclampsia group compared to the control and neuroprotection groups. On the day of birth, this is irrespective of maternal magnesemia (preeclampsia vs control groups), and the maternal total dose or duration of MgSO4 administration (preeclampsia vs neuroprotection group). No differences were found in short-term composite outcome between the three groups. CONCLUSION: We found mean differences in neonatal magnesemia between children not exposed to MgSO4 antenatally, children exposed for fetal neuroprotection, and children exposed for maternal eclampsia prevention. A 4-g loading and 1-g/h maintenance doses, for fetal neuroprotection and eclampsia prevention, appear to be safe on the short term for the neonate. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Magnesium sulphate is a valuable medicine in obstetrics. The main indications are prevention of eclampsia and fetal neuroprotection. The most used dosage is a 4- or 6-g loading dose and a 1- or 2-g per h maintenance dose. It reduces neuromotor disabilities in extreme-to-moderate preterm born children. WHAT IS NEW: • Maternal concentrations are supraphysiological and the maternal total dose can be high. Concentrations in neonates appear to remain in safe ranges. A dosage of 4-g loading and 1 g/h seems safe for the preterm neonate on the short term.

A novel 12-hour versus 24-hour magnesium sulfate regimen in the management of eclampsia and preeclampsia in Ghana (MOPEP Study): A randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: We compared the efficacy of a 12-h versus 24-h regimen of intramuscular magnesium sulfate in the management of eclampsia and preeclampsia. METHODS: This is an open-labeled parallel randomized controlled trial conducted in Accra, Ghana from November 2018 to November 2020. Participants were adult pregnant women admitted to the Korle Bu Teaching Hospital (KBTH) with a diagnosis of antepartum, intrapartum, or postpartum eclampsia or preeclampsia with severe features, having received no more than a loading dose of magnesium sulfate prior to admission at KBTH. Participants in the standard 24-h group received a loading dose of magnesium sulfate 4 g intravenous and 10 g intramuscular (5 g in each buttock) followed by six, 5 g intramuscular maintenance doses over 24 h. Participants in the 12-h intervention group received the same loading dose followed by three, 5 g intramuscular maintenance doses over 12 h. The primary outcome was occurrence of seizure after completion of the assigned magnesium sulfate regimen. Secondary outcomes were magnesium sulfate toxicity, magnesium sulfate side effects, maternal outcomes (mode of delivery, duration of inpatient admission, duration of urethral catheterization), maternal complications (pulmonary edema, acute kidney injury, intensive care unit admission, death), and neonatal outcomes. RESULTS: Among 1176 total participants, we found no difference in occurrence of seizure after completion of the assigned regimen in the 24-h group (n = 5, 0.9%) versus the 12-h group (n = 2, 0.3%), P = 0.29; RR 0.40, 95% CI 0.08, 2.04), or in occurrence of seizure any time after enrollment (n = 9, 1.5% vs. n = 5, 0.9%, P = 0.28, RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.19-1.64). Participants in the 12-h group had a shorter duration of inpatient admission (9.4 ± 8.8 vs. 7.7 ± 6.5 days, P = 0.0009) and urethral catheterization (2.1 ± 1.0 vs. 1.9 ± 1.3 days, P < 0.0001). Rates of side effects from magnesium sulfate were lower in the 12-h group: pain at the injection site (94.8% (n = 548) vs. 91.5% (n = 540), P = 0.03), inflammation (62.2% (n = 358) vs. 40.0% (n = 237), P < 0.0001), and bleeding or bruising at the injection site (25.1% (n = 144) vs. 14.4% (n = 85), P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with 24 h, 12 h of intramuscular magnesium sulfate showed similar rates of seizures, with fewer side effects and shorter inpatient admission. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Prospective registration was with Pan African Clinical Trial Registry (PACTR201811515303983): https://pactr.samrc.ac.za/TrialDisplay.aspx?TrialID=4690.

Coronavirus disease 2019 on routine testing in eclampsia: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 has been associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes, including preeclampsia. Coronavirus disease 2019 and preeclampsia have overlapping clinical features and are therefore challenging to differentiate. Since pregnant women are not routinely tested for coronavirus disease 2019, it is prudent to test for it among patients presenting with preeclampsia or eclampsia. CASE PRESENTATION: A 23-year-old female, a Munda, gravida 1 para 0, at 36 weeks and 5 days of amenorrhea presented to Mal Super Specialty Hospital as a referral in a semiconscious state after a severe attack of tonic-clonic seizures. Detailed history from the husband was insignificant except for a persistent cough for the last 7 days. She had denied any visual changes, headaches, or vaginal discharge. Physical examination revealed tachycardia (150 beats per minute), elevated blood pressure (187/111 mmHg), tachypnea (36 breaths per minute), and oxygen saturation of 94% on room air. Routine coronavirus disease 2019 rapid test was positive, and urine dipstick was +3. Additional tests revealed leukocytosis and elevated liver enzymes. Chest radiograph revealed prominent interstitial markings, and a bedside transabdominal ultrasonography showed a live single intrauterine fetus in cephalic presentation with normal cardiac activity and movements. A diagnosis of a prime gravida with eclampsia and coronavirus disease 2019 was made. She was managed with intravenous labetalol; she had already received a loading dose of intravenous magnesium sulfate, and we administered two maintenance doses during monitoring. Within an hour of admission, she had a spontaneous rupture of the amniotic membranes, with meconium-stained liquor (grade 2), and the fetal heart rate (148 beats per minute) was reassuring. She had an uncomplicated vaginal delivery of a live male newborn. Shortly after delivery, she developed slight respiratory distress and significant fluid overload that was managed with furosemide. Coronavirus disease 2019 reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction test came back negative for the neonate and positive for the mother. She was shifted to the coronavirus disease 2019 treatment unit, and her contact with the child was limited. She was kept on a course of tablets ivermectin, zinc, vitamin C, montelukast, azithromycin, metronidazole, and injectable pantoprazole. The mother and child were discharged on day 15 after recovery with negative COVID nasopharyngeal swab. CONCLUSION: A diagnosis of preeclampsia or eclampsia should prompt testing for coronavirus disease 2019.

Factors affecting use of magnesium sulphate for pre-eclampsia or eclampsia: a qualitative evidence synthesis.

BACKGROUND: Hypertensive disorders account for 14% of global maternal deaths. Magnesium sulphate (MgSO4 ) is recommended for prevention and treatment of pre-eclampsia/eclampsia. However, MgSO4 remains underused, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). OBJECTIVE: This qualitative evidence synthesis explores perceptions and experiences of healthcare providers, administrators and policy-makers regarding factors affecting use of MgSO4 to prevent or treat pre-eclampsia/eclampsia. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Emcare, CINAHL, Global Health and Global Index Medicus, and grey literature for studies published between January 1995 and June 2021. SELECTION CRITERIA: Primary qualitative and mixed-methods studies on factors affecting use of MgSO4 in healthcare settings, from the perspectives of healthcare providers, administrators and policy-makers, were eligible for inclusion. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We applied a thematic synthesis approach to analysis, using COM-B behaviour change theory to map factors affecting appropriate use of MgSO4 . MAIN RESULTS: We included 22 studies, predominantly from LMICs. Key themes included provider competence and confidence administering MgSO4 (attitudes and beliefs, complexities of administering, knowledge and experience), capability of health systems to ensure MgSO4 availability at point of use (availability, resourcing and pathways to care) and knowledge translation (dissemination of research and recommendations). Within each COM-B domain, we mapped facilitators and barriers to physical and psychological capability, physical and social opportunity, and how the interplay between these domains influences motivation. CONCLUSIONS: These findings can inform policy and guideline development and improve implementation of MgSO4 in clinical care. Such action is needed to ensure this life-saving treatment is widely available and appropriately used. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Global qualitative review identifies factors affecting underutilisation of MgSO4 for pre-eclampsia and eclampsia.

Tratamiento de la eclampsia y miastenia gravis: reporte de un caso y revisión de la literatura / Eclampsia treatment and myasthenia gravis: case report and review of literature

OBJETIVO: Reportar el caso de una gestante con miastenia grave (MG) más preeclampsia-eclampsia y crisis miasténica en el puerperio mediato, y realizar una revisión de la literatura sobre el manejo farmacológico. MÉTODO: Se presenta el caso de una mujer de 26 años con MG, primigesta de 36 semanas de gestación, quien cursó con eclampsia y recibió fenitoína por 24 horas. Tuvo parto espontáneo sin complicaciones y crisis miasténica al día 11 del puerperio asociada a infección de vías urinarias y sepsis. Se realiza revisión de la literatura en PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, LILACS y Scopus, empleando los términos "Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced", "Preeclampsia" y "Eclampsia", combinados con "Myasthenia Gravis", durante el periodo de publicación de 1960 a junio 2020, en inglés y español. RESULTADOS: Se encontraron 12 reportes de caso, dos con eclampsia y MG; el caso aquí reportado es el número 13. Ocho pacientes no recibieron medicamentos profilácticos de eclampsia y tres de ellas convulsionaron. En las que se usó sulfato de magnesio, todas cursaron con crisis miasténica. CONCLUSIONES: La evidencia actual en cuanto a la profilaxis y el tratamiento de la eclampsia y la MG corresponde a reportes de casos. El uso de sulfato de magnesio está contraindicado en pacientes con MG, por lo que se han utilizado fenitoína y levetiracetam.

OBJECTIVE: To report a case of pregnant women with myasthenia gravis (MG), plus preeclampsia-eclampsia and myasthenic crisis in the mediate puerperium; to conduct a literature review regarding its pharmacological management. METHOD: 26-year-old primigravida with 36 weeks of gestation and previous history of MG, who developed eclampsia and was treated with phenytoin for 24 hours, with later spontaneous delivery without any complications nor new seizures; and myasthenic crisis on day 11 of the puerperium associated with urinary tract infection and sepsis. A literature review was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, LILACS and Scopus, using the controlled vocabulary "Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced", "Preeclampsia" and "Eclampsia", combined with "Myasthenia Gravis", between 1960 and June 2020, in English and Spanish. RESULTS: 12 case reports were found, two of these with eclampsia and MG, the case reported here was number 13. In eight cases patients did not receive any prophylactic drugs for eclampsia and three of them had convulsions. In the cases where magnesium sulfate was used, all developed myasthenic crisis. CONCLUSIONS: The current evidence regarding prophylactic management and treatment corresponds to case reports. The use of magnesium sulfate is contraindicated in patients with MG, therefore phenytoin and levetiracetam have been used.

Reversible Cerebral Vasoconstriction Syndrome in a Background of Eclampsia Responding to Milrinone Infusion.

BACKGROUND Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS) is a rare neurological disorder with a complex physiopathology that is not fully understood. Suggested underlying mechanisms include failure of autoregulation, endothelial dysfunction, and oxidative stress. It is characterized by reversible multifocal constriction of the cerebral arteries, and can be triggered by many conditions, including, vasoactive medications (eg, triptans), cerebrovascular events, primary headache disorders, and metabolic causes (eg, hypercalcemia). RCVS can also be associated with pregnancy-related conditions, such as thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura, eclampsia, and pre-eclampsia. Thunderclap headache is the most common clinical manifestation; however, other symptoms can result from complications of the disease, such as stroke, brain edema, and seizures. Several case reports have been published of an association between RCVS and eclampsia, but to the best of our knowledge, only 3 cases were successfully treated with intravenous milrinone and this is the only patient reported in Saudi Arabia. CASE REPORT We report a case of 25-year-old primigravida woman who presented with acute-onset headache, nausea, elevated blood pressure, and generalized tonic clonic seizure. She was diagnosed as having RCVS secondary to eclampsia based on clinical and radiological features. She was initially started on nimodipine, which is usually the first-line management of RCVS, as well as magnesium sulfate and levetiracetam; however, she only achieved full recovery after starting intravenous milrinone. CONCLUSIONS Milrinone is one of the emerging drugs for treatment of RCVS, and this case report delineates the potential of using the drug, especially in cases refractory to standard therapy.

Evaluating the maternal and perinatal sequelae of severe gestational hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy are widespread and have long-standing implications for women's health. Historically, the management of "severe gestational hypertension," or the presence of severely elevated blood pressures without any other signs or symptoms of end-organ damage meeting the criteria for preeclampsia, has been unclear. The new American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists guidelines based on expert opinion recommend that severe gestational hypertension be treated similarly to preeclampsia with severe features, but data regarding outcomes for women with this diagnosis have been limited. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the maternal and perinatal sequelae of severe gestational hypertension with that of other types of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study of women with hypertensive disease of pregnancy who delivered at a single tertiary care center between February and December 2018. Women with chronic hypertension; hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelet count syndrome; preexisting kidney, liver, rheumatologic, or hematologic disorders; or multifetal pregnancies were excluded. Women were categorized as having severe gestational hypertension if they had a sustained systolic blood pressure of >160 mm Hg or a diastolic blood pressure of >110 mm Hg without other criteria for preeclampsia. The primary comparison was between women with severe gestational hypertension and women with preeclampsia without severe features. Secondary comparisons included women with severe gestational hypertension vs women with other types of hypertensive disease of pregnancy. The primary outcome for this analysis was small-for-gestational-age birth. We also evaluated other maternal and neonatal morbidities including but not limited to pulmonary embolism, stroke, eclampsia, blood transfusion, mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit admission, death, 5-minute Apgar score of ≤4, umbilical cord pH, neonatal intensive care unit admission of >2 days, respiratory distress syndrome, and neonatal death. Bivariate analyses using chi-square tests and logistic regressions adjusting for race, ethnicity, age, body mass index, parity, and insurance status were performed to compare frequencies of outcomes for each type of hypertensive disease of pregnancy with those of severe gestational hypertension. RESULTS: Of 2076 women eligible for inclusion, 12.2% (n=254) had severe gestational hypertension and 379 (18.2%) had preeclampsia without severe features. Although there was no difference in the odds of small-for-gestational-age birth between women with severe gestational hypertension and women with preeclampsia without severe features (14.7% vs 9.8%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.72; 95% confidence interval, 0.44-1.21), the latter were significantly less likely to receive a prescription for antihypertensive medication at discharge (OR 0.11, 95% CI 0.06-0.22) or to be readmitted postpartum (OR 0.14, 95% CI 0.04-0.50). CONCLUSION: There was no difference in the primary outcome, that is, rate of small-for-gestational-age birth, between women with severe gestational hypertension and women with preeclampsia without severe features. However, women with severe gestational hypertension had greater odds of other maternal and neonatal morbidities than women with preeclampsia without severe features or mild gestational hypertension. These findings support recent recommendations regarding the management of women with severe gestational hypertension.

Neuropathophysiology of preeclampsia and eclampsia: A review of cerebral hemodynamic principles in hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.

Preeclampsia and eclampsia are hypertensive disorders of pregnancy associated with abnormal placental vascular development. The systemic angiogenic imbalance, endothelial dysfunction and proinflammatory state caused by abnormal placental development results in abnormalities in renal, hepatic, pulmonary and neurologic function. Neurosensory symptoms related to pregnancy induced hypertension (PIH), the most devastating of which are intracranial hemorrhage and seizure, are among the leading causes of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality globally, yet risk stratification strategies and targeted therapies remain elusive. Current treatment for preeclampsia with severe features is limited to delivery, antihypertensive therapy, and magnesium sulfate seizure prophylaxis. Magnesium sulfate reduces seizure rates among severe preeclamptics, but predisposes patients to weakness, uterine atony, pulmonary edema and respiratory depression. Therefore, this drug should ideally be administered only to the subset of preeclamptics who are at increased risk for neurologic complications. While there are no objective methods validated to predict eclampsia, we hypothesize that measurement of optic nerve sheath diameters, optic disc height and middle cerebral artery transcranial doppler resistance indices may be useful in identifying subclinical cerebral edema, potentially allowing us to recognize those patients at highest risk for seizures. This summary of the current literature provides an initial framework for developing more sophisticated and noninvasive methods for identifying, monitoring and treating parturients who are at highest risk for neurologic complications from preeclampsia.

Sulfato de magnésio: principais utilizações na obstetrícia contemporânea / Magnesium sulphate: main uses in contemporary obstetrics

O sulfato de magnésio tem sido utilizado em obstetrícia por décadas e milhares de mulheres já foram incluídas em ensaios clínicos que estudaram sua eficácia em uma variedade de condições gestacionais. Os principais usos do medicamento na atual prática obstétrica incluem prevenção e tratamento de convulsões eclâmpticas, prolongamento da gravidez para administração antenatal de corticosteroides e neuroproteção fetal na iminência de interrupção prematura da gravidez. Em função da alta qualidade e da consistência dos resultados de importantes ensaios clínicos, a indicação do sulfato de magnésio para profilaxia e terapia das convulsões eclâmpticas está bem estabelecida. Entretanto, tal unanimidade não ocorre com relação ao seu emprego como tocolítico, tanto pela discussão sobre sua efetividade quanto pelas doses mais altas usualmente utilizadas para esse fim. Em relação à importância do sulfato de magnésio como agente neuroprotetor fetal, a paralisia cerebral é a causa mais comum de deficiência motora na infância e tem como fator de risco mais importante a prematuridade, cuja incidência tem aumentado significativamente. Diretrizes nacionais e internacionais mais recentes, baseadas em resultados de ensaios clínicos randomizados e metanálises de boa qualidade, mostraram que a administração antenatal de sulfato de magnésio na iminência de parto pré-termo precoce é uma intervenção eficiente, viável, segura, com boa relação custo-benefício e pode contribuir para a melhoria dos desfechos neurológicos neonatais.

Magnesium sulfate has been used in obstetrics for decades and thousands of women have already been included in clinical trials that have studied its effectiveness in a variety of gestational conditions. The main uses of the drug in current obstetrical practice include prevention and treatment of eclamptic seizures, prolongation of pregnancy for antenatal administration of corticosteroids, and fetal neuroprotection in the imminence of premature termination of pregnancy. Because of the high quality and consistency of the results of important clinical trials, the indication of magnesium sulfate for prophylaxis and therapy of eclamptic seizures is well established. However, such unanimity does not occur regarding its use as tocolytic, either by the discussion of its effectiveness or by the higher doses usually used for this purpose. Regarding the importance of magnesium sulfate as a fetal neuroprotective agent, cerebral palsy is the most common cause of motor deficits in childhood and has a significantly higher incidence of prematurity as a major risk factor. More recent national and international guidelines, based on results from randomized controlled trials and good quality meta-analyzes, have shown that the antenatal administration of magnesium sulfate at the imminence of early preterm delivery is a cost-effective, viable, efficient intervention and safe and can contribute to the improvement of neonatal neurological outcomes.

Atypical reversible posterior encephalopathy due to eclampsia. Case presentation.

ANTECEDENTES: La encefalopatía posterior reversible se relaciona con enfermedades hipertensivas del embarazo, con clínica inespecífica. El diagnóstico se realiza mediante resonancia magnética y electroencefalograma, y el tratamiento oportuno evita complicaciones. CASO CLÍNICO: Primigesta de 15 años con embarazo pretérmino, hipertensión arterial y convulsiones tónico-clónicas, que desarrolló encefalopatía posterior atípica con múltiples lesiones cerebrales. Se administraron antihipertensivos, sin mejoría de los síntomas neurológicos. El manejo de esta patología depende de la situación desencadenante, no existe evidencia suficiente del soporte con medidas antiedema preventivas en pacientes con factores de riesgo. El retraso en el tratamiento oportuno y la presentación atípica favorecen la progresión de las secuelas neurológicas. BACKGROUND: Reversible posterior encephalopathy is related to hypertensive diseases of pregnancy, with a nonspecific clinic. The diagnosis is made by magnetic resonance and electroencephalogram, appropriate treatment prevents complications. ­­. CASE REPORT: 15-year-old primigesta with preterm pregnancy, arterial hypertension and tonic-clonic seizures, presents atypical posterior encephalopathy with multiple brain lesions, antihypertensives were administered without improvement of neurological symptoms. The management of this pathology depends on the triggering situation, there is insufficient evidence to support preventive anti-edema measures in patients with risk factors. The delay in timely treatment and atypical presentation favors the progression of neurological sequelae.